June
2004
State of New Jersey Files Ten Natural Resource Damage Suits
Trenton, NJ— Attorney General Peter C. Harvey and
Environmental Commissioner Bradley M. Campbell announced the filing of
10 natural resource damage complaints, representing the first round in
an unprecedented initiative to make polluters compensate the residents
of New Jersey for damage to or loss of natural resources due to pollution.
The suits target companies alleged to have polluted
12 sites in 9 counties.
The McGreevey Administration has negotiated more natural
resource damage (NRD) compensation from polluters in 2 1/2 years than
was obtained during the previous 10-year history of the NRD program in
New Jersey.
“My administration is holding polluters accountable,”
said Governor James E. McGreevey.
“This is just the first wave of natural resource
damage cases,” said Attorney General Harvey.
“New Jersey is sending a clear message that polluters
will be held accountable for damages to our state’s water resources
and for diminishing our residents’ quality of life,” said
DEP Commissioner Campbell.
Last September, Attorney General Harvey and Commissioner
Campbell announced a major policy directive to address more than 4,000
potential NRD claims statewide. At that time, Commissioner Campbell ordered
66 responsible parties to assess natural resource injuries involving 18
sites in the Lower Passaic River watershed and to undertake any necessary
restoration projects.
In November, Attorney General Harvey and Commissioner
Campbell joined Governor McGreevey to announce a record-setting $17 million
NRD settlement involving 3 corporations linked to chromium contamination
in Hudson and Essex counties. Another milestone was reached with the filing
of the first round of complaints under the NRD initiative.
The 10 complaints that are being filed involve sites
that typically suffered contamination during a period of many years. They
include actions against some major corporations. The complaints involve
the following defendants and sites that were contaminated with hazardous
substances:
•7-Eleven Inc.: Southland Corporation site on
Alphano Road in Independence Township, Warren County, contaminated by
discharges from plant where the defendant, formerly known as The Southland
Corporation, manufactured organic chemicals;
•Bob Baldwin’s Transportation Inc., Chevron
Texaco, Peet Blokker Inc. and Robert E. Baldwin: Baldwin site near Omega
and Theta Drives in Vernon Township, Sussex County, and nearby Peet
Blokker site, both contaminated by discharges from retail gasoline service
stations and fuel oil storage or distribution operations; contamination
of soils, ground water and Omega Drive public water supply wells;
•ACR Inc. of South Jersey and United States Steel
Corporation: Tabernacle Drum Dump Superfund site on Caranza Road, Tabernacle
Township, Burlington County, contaminated by discharges from approximately
200 drums and other containers disposed of by ACR, some of which belonged
to U.S. Steel, containing hazardous substances, including solvents,
heavy metals and paint sludges;
•Viacom Inc. and Sony Music Entertainment Inc.:
CBS Records site at 400 North Woodbury Road in Pitman Borough, Gloucester
County, contaminated by discharges from record and compact disc manufacturing
plant;
•AT&T Corporation: AT&T site in Hanover
Township, Morris County, contaminated by discharges from research and
development operations; contamination of soils, sediments and ground
water as well as wetlands and surface water adjacent to site;
•General Dynamics Corporation: General Dynamics
site in Woodbridge, Middlesex County, contaminated by discharges from
plant where General Dynamics Corporation manufactured mechanical components
for military and industrial equipment; prior owners manufactured steel
office furniture at site;
•General Electric Company: General Electric site
in Hamilton, Mercer County, contaminated by discharges from plant used
by G.E. for manufacturing electrical switchgears and appliances;
•International Business Machines Corporation:
IBM site in Dayton, Middlesex County, contaminated by chlorinated cleaning
solvents used at company’s facility; contamination of South Brunswick’s
public water supply;
•Reichhold Inc.: Two sites: Reichhold Elizabeth
site in Elizabeth, Union County, and Reichhold Newark site at 46 Albert
Avenue in Newark, Essex County, both contaminated by discharges from
plants where the company manufactured resins and chemicals;
•Rowe International Inc.: Rowe International
site at 75 Troy Hills Road in Hanover Township, Morris County, contaminated
by discharges from plant where company manufactured vending machines.
At most of these sites, the responsible parties are
conducting cleanup of the discharges of hazardous substances. The Spill
Act imposes liability on any party that has discharged hazardous substances
onto the land or into the waters of the state – or is in any way
responsible for a hazardous substance that is discharged – for
cleanup and removal costs, including the cost of restoring or replacing
natural resources injured by the discharge. The complaints being filed
also seek to hold the defendants responsible for such cleanups.
|