|
JULY
2009
Curbside or co-mingled collections:
quality should always come first
Sorting household recycling
at the curbside is the best
and cheapest option in most
cases, according to UK’s Waste & Resources
Action Programme (WRAP).
WRAP is publishing its view
on the various ways of collecting
household recycling drawing
on the latest research. Local
authorities are best placed
to determine which collection
method is most suitable. WRAP
recognizes that physical conditions
like high rise housing or highly
congested roads may prevent
sorting at curbside being the
best choice in some circumstances.
However, where local authorities
have the choice, and curbside
collections are not an option,
two stream collections which
keep paper and card separate
from other materials, especially
glass, are preferable. This
is because they produce the
best material for recycling
by keeping contamination levels
down.
Fully co-mingled (mixed) collections
have cost and quality disadvantages
which should limit their use
except where other options are
not suitable.
WRAP is presenting its views,
drawing on work it has done
over the last three years, and
the latest research in a leaflet
‘Choosing the Right Recycling
Collection System’ at the FutuResource
conference in London. This is
in the light of the growing
debate on the merits of various
collection systems.
WRAP acknowledges that local
authorities are best placed
to judge the circumstances in
their areas and make the choice
of collection system, and WRAP’s
views are intended to help them
in considering options.
Among the conclusions is that
sorting recycling at the curbside
provides the best quality material
and, when total costs are taken
into account, is cheaper for
council taxpayers. This flies
in the face of the popular belief
that co-mingled recycling collections
are cheaper.
WRAP argues the evidence is
clear that the quality of the
materials recovered for recycling
is affected by the way they
are collected. Quality is important
because it affects the uses
the material can be put to.
Quality materials can be easily
reused in ways which give the
most benefit to the environment.
Curbside sorted materials are
consistently good quality with
less than one percent being
rejected. Co-mingled collections
are subject to higher contamination
rates and have higher levels
of rejection.
Reprocessors of recycled materials
in the UK are currently struggling
to find enough good quality
material for their needs from
UK sources despite the volumes
being exported. As a result
they are importing some material.
Although curbside sorted materials
have the best quality and are
likely to go to the most beneficial
uses, consumers can still be
confident that the great majority
of co-mingled materials are
recycled in some form and are
not sent to landfill.
|