Sloppy Housekeeping Leads to Conviction
The essence of our mobile society
is a reliance upon vehicles that have a definitive
life span. When these vehicles reach the end of
that life, they journey to a mortuary known as an
auto salvage yard where they are prepared for their
next life. This process includes storing, dismantling
and crushing the vehicles, resulting in a variety
of waste streams including spent solvents, degreasers,
cleaning fluids, thinners, used oils, brake and
transmission fluids, antifreeze, batteries and a
host of others which may or may not be considered
hazardous wastes.
The opportunity to operate a profitable
auto salvage business comes with the typical web
of government regulations requiring the various
waste streams to be managed and disposed of in a
specific manner. While the costs of establishing
routine procedures for complying with this morass
of regulatory requirements can eat into the bottom
line of any business struggling to make a profit,
the cost of not complying can result in a criminal
conviction, damage to the reputation of a business,
fines and/or a loss of personal freedom.
On August 8, 2005, a New York appellate
court affirmed the conviction of a salvage yard
for endangering the environment and discharging
pollutants to waters of the state in People v. M&H
Used Auto Parts & Cars, Inc., 799 N.Y.S.2d 784
(2005). The salvage operation in this case did not
involve any unusual activities. As might be expected,
the yard dismantled old vehicles, during which process,
liquids such as antifreeze, oil and gasoline would
simply drain onto the ground and remain after being
covered with “speedy dry.” The yard
also had a sump on the property that collected liquids
such as water, oil, antifreeze and gasoline. A hose
led from the sump to a hole in the wall that in
turn led to the street and a storm sewer, which
eventually found its way through a series of underground
pipes to Flushing Bay.
The facts of this specific case
point to a number of basic “good housekeeping”
practices that, if followed, may substantially reduce
or eliminate the possibility of a criminal prosecution:
In addition to these “housekeeping”
procedures, other steps may reduce the potential
for a civil or administrative action. First, an
operator should determine which regulatory provisions
apply to their specific operation and ensure that
their procedures are designed to meet those requirements.
Second, the operator should be certain that all
permits, licenses, and spill and run-off plans are
correct and current. Third, the facility should
identify all waste streams and evaluate them to
determine whether they are hazardous or non-hazardous.
Finally, documentation demonstrating the proper
management and disposal of waste materials should
be retained in a central location.
The prosecution of M&H sends
a clear signal that the government takes compliance
with environmental requirements in the auto recycling
industry very seriously. The best means to avoid
a potential investigation, prosecution and subsequent
conviction and recognition as an “eco-criminal”
is a thorough understanding of and compliance with
the environmental regulations that affect your business.