Construction and demolition debris restrictions
inconsistent
by
Brian R. Hook

More cities and states across
the country are placing restrictions on the kinds of construction
and demolition debris allowed in landfills. But industry insiders
tell American Recycler it is more a patchwork of rules rather
than a widespread trend.
John Skinner, executive director
and chief executive officer of the Solid Waste Association of
North America in Silver Spring, Maryland, said he has heard of
a few restrictions put on C&D debris. “But, I haven’t
heard it on a wide scale,” he said.
“Sometimes there’s
a concern, for example, about particular types of C&D waste,
such as gypsum wallboard. It could easily get wet and form hydrogen
sulfide. I’ve also heard some concerns about coated or treated
wood, due to the arsenic in the wood. But I haven’t heard
of a wide-scale prohibition of C&D wastes in landfills,”
Skinner said.
Skinner said the association’s
position on restrictions is simple: “No ban without a plan.”
If states or municipalities want to restrict C&D waste, those
entities need to establish an infrastructure for managing those
wastes. “If you want C&D to be recycled, you should
work to establish the facilities to recycle that material,”
Skinner said.
“It is counterproductive
just to ban those wastes from being disposed of in the landfill
and not have an alternative, because what happens then is it finds
its way some other place. If there’s no plan, the C&D
waste will simply go to another state.”
Chaz Miller, director of recycling
and state programs at the National Solid Wastes Management Association
in Washington D.C., said some states have banned the disposal
of C&D materials from landfills. But so far, there are no
federal restrictions. “If the state has well developed markets,
the banned materials may be recycled,” Miller said. “The
challenge is finding new markets for C&D materials that are
banned from disposal.”
Chicago is an example of a city
that has implemented C&D debris restrictions. As American
Recycler reported, Chicago will require contractors to recycle
25 percent of all C&D debris starting in January. That number
will increase to 50 percent by 2007.
Bob Brickner, senior vice president
at Gershman, Brickner & Bratton Inc., a waste management consulting
firm in Fairfax, Virginia, said that these types of restrictions
are not a new trend in the industry. Instead, he said that different
types of restrictions on what goes into landfills have been slowly
increasing over the decades.
“Depending upon what state
you’re in, some are doing absolutely nothing. Some states
are doing nothing but regulating it and others are much more aggressive
as they put forth their regulations and try to embed recycling
goals and requirements,” Brickner said.
“There are pockets of things
going on depending upon how aggressive the legislatures may be.
Are they trendsetters like California or are they followers like
unfortunately too many other states? Massachusetts is a good exception.”
William Turley, executive director
of Construction Materials Recycling Association, in Eola, Illinois,
said Massachusetts will soon require all concrete, asphalt, brick,
block, metals and wood from the C&D waste stream to pass through
a recycling center before it can be disposed of. Turley said that
the state worked with those in the waste-management industry,
including his members, to make these goals feasible.
“Their long-range goals
are to add gypsum and asphalt shingles to this ban. Many states,
especially those around Massachusetts, are going to watch to see
how the ban goes,” he said. Turley said he expects other
states to also tighten C&D restrictions.
“Obviously, it means more
work for the C&D recyclers. But they continue to need market
outlets for the products. It would be more helpful for these governmental
entities to pass laws requiring the purchase of recycled products
in their bid specs, rather than just requiring the material to
go to a recycler,” Turley said. He said often cities will
mandate the recycling of material, but the same cities won’t
buy back the recycled end product.
Turley said that his association
estimated the total C&D waste stream at about 325 million
tons per year. He said that U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
is updating its 1997 estimate of building-related C&D waste
generation, which was 136 million tons. Turley said the amount
calculated by the EPA did not include road and bridge work.
C&D debris accounted for
almost 22 percent of the waste stream in California last year,
according to the California Integrated Waste Management Board
in Sacramento. The board is responsible for managing the state’s
solid waste stream. It works closely with local government entities
to meet the state’s 50 percent waste-diversion mandate.
“The Integrated Waste Management
Act is material-neutral and it is up to the local jurisdictions
to target materials and programs to meet their diversion mandates,”
said Catherine Cardozo, supervising integrated waste management
specialist at CIWMB.
“C&D is a natural target
because of its density and prevalence. There is no state statutory
restriction on C&D in landfills per se; although it may be
that some jurisdictions have a local ban on its disposal.”
She said about 100 jurisdictions have adopted a C&D diversion
ordinance and another 15 to 20 are under development.
C&D waste that is diverted
in California goes to various recycling facilities. “Some
only accept separated material, like only wood, or only metal,
or only asphalt and concrete,” Cardozo said. “With
the potential for the demand for these materials to go up as a
result of ordinance adoption driving the market, this also has
the potential to create additional infrastructure to accept these
materials throughout the state.”
As just one example, Cardozo
said the city of Fresno is anticipating it will receive a large
volume of C&D waste as a result of its recent adoption of
a C&D diversion ordinance that requires contractors to take
C&D materials to recyclers. “As a result, they are working
to ultimately get ten C&D recycling facilities into the area,”
Cardozo said. |